Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Christian Sigsgaard vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sigsgaard vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Christian Sigsgaard vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sigsgaard 1 - 0 Nijboer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sigsgaard has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sigsgaard, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 51.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sigsgaard has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 53.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sigsgaard has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 9/ 8), with Nijboer winning 61.7% (W/L 58/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sigsgaard has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 23/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Sigsgaard has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.23% of matches (W/L 45/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sigsgaard winning 1 times and Nijboer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sigsgaard winning 2 and Nijboer winning 0. The last match between Sigsgaard and Nijboer was at the M15 Vejle, 28-07-2021, First, Clay with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sigsgaard and Nijboer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sigsgaard winning 0 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sigsgaard winning 0, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sigsgaard has played against opponents with an average rank of 199.18 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 201.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sigsgaard has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sigsgaard has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 43.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
876
Rank
753
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
431
Rank
428
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
63% (89-53)
Career Total W/L
57% (224-172)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
55% (22-18)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Christian Sigsgaard | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 92% (47/51) | 75% (53/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (31/47) | 58% (31/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (3/4) | 22% (4/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (36/71) | 33% (17/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Ryan Nijboer
92%
(
47 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Christian Sigsgaard | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (22/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (52/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (462/427) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (14/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 133 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 159 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 255.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (1679/2810) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (1145/1679) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (550/1131) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (139/321) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (1186/2853) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (9/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (22/40) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (23/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (23/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 24% (17/4) |
Christian Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Siem Woldeab
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
119)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Bogdan Bobrov
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Koray Kirci
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Issa Alharrasi
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
42%
(
13 of
31)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
22 of
22)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Ryan Nijboer
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Johan Nikles
61%
(
77 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
90 of
127)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
George Goldhoff
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sigsgaard Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sigsgaard are available here and Nijboer photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Christian Sigsgaard
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
